AI Code Review for Vibe-Coded Apps
Manual review of AI-generated code by senior engineers. Find what the AI missed.
AI builders ship code fast. They also ship code that fails on edge cases, leaks secrets, and skips authorization. We do a manual line-by-line review of your AI-generated codebase and tell you exactly what's broken before users find out.
From $450
The problem
Cursor, Claude Code, Lovable, Replit, and Bolt all generate code with the same blind spots: missing input validation, hallucinated APIs, inconsistent style, leaked secrets, and bypassed auth. Tools like SonarQube and ESLint don't catch most of these because they're semantic, not syntactic. You need a senior engineer to read it.
How we work
We clone your repo, build a framework-aware understanding of the codebase, then walk through every authentication path, every API boundary, every data access pattern, and every external integration. You get a prioritized findings document with file:line references and remediation guidance.
What's included
- Manual review by a senior engineer (not just SAST output)
- Auth and authorization audit (RLS, middleware, API checks)
- Secret exposure scan (env vars, client bundles, logs)
- External integration review (Stripe, Supabase, OpenAI, etc.)
- Code quality and architecture findings
- Prioritized remediation plan with file:line citations
- Async Q&A after delivery
Who this is for
- You built with Cursor, Claude Code, Lovable, Replit, Bolt, v0, or Base44
- You're about to launch and want a sanity check
- You inherited an AI-built codebase and don't know what's in it
- You want a senior pair of eyes before customers find the issues
Related services
Code Audit
Senior engineer review of your full codebase. Architecture, security, performance, best practices.
From $450
Security Audit
Manual review of authentication, authorization, secrets, and integrations.
From $300
Hire an AI Developer
Senior engineers who specialize in AI-generated codebases. Fixed quotes. 24-hour response.
Custom quote
Frequently asked questions
- How is this different from running ESLint or SonarQube?
- Static analysis tools catch syntax issues but miss semantic problems. They can't tell that your Stripe webhook is missing signature verification, or that your Supabase RLS policy lets anon read all rows. A human review catches what tools can't.
- What if my codebase is huge?
- We scope by surface area, not lines of code. A 50,000-line Next.js app with 30 API routes and one auth flow is faster to audit than a 5,000-line app with sprawling logic. Tell us roughly what you have and we'll quote accordingly.
- Do you fix the issues you find?
- The Code Audit ($450+) is review-only with a remediation plan. If you want fixes too, our Fix Bugs or Add Features service handles the implementation.
Ready to get started?
Tell us about your project. Fixed quote within 24 hours.